Google Wave Is Not Dead (Yet)

I just think that at this stage of the game Google needs to begin taking its massive portfolio of applications and either fold one into the other or make them part in parcel of a larger platform.

We all know that messaging (in all its formats) is a massive business. It would have been great if Google married services like gmail, Wave, Buzz, Voice, Blogger, Friend Connect and made it into a rather robust messaging platform. As such a Google user would never have to leave the Google ecosystem to gain access to Google services or other services like Twitter and Facebook.

Lastly, service availability must be accessed through a clean and customizable dashboard. I know the iGoogle is available but it’s just not up to the job.

Amplify’d from mashable.com

This prompted Google to shut the service down in August, making some parts of Wave open source. Furthermore, Google promised to create tools that will help users extract their content from Wave.

Now, in a blog post, Google has an update on Wave, promising two things. First, Wave will be available “at least through the end of the year.” Furthermore, tools that will enable users to export their waves will be available “before the end of the year.”

Also, Google claims it’s still looking into “ways to continue and extend Wave technology in other Google products,” as well as “open sourcing more of (Google’s) code.” So, while Wave as it was will probably never make a comeback, don’t be surprised if you see a feature or two from Wave reincarnated in Gmail.

Read more at mashable.com

 


Google bringing a Chrome OS tablet to Verizon #mobile

I believe that I would buy the Google Chrome Tablet. I am under the assumption that tablet will be subsidized by Google and Verizon. This would make that tablet very inexpensive. I wonder if the tablet was further subsidized by Google Ads — in essence making the tablet free — would consumers and prosumers flock to purchase?

It’s in Google’s best interest to make certain that the Chrome tablet is a massive success. Google must place its massive financial weight behind this project. The iPad as had eight months of near zero competition — it’s Google’s game to lose.

Amplify’d from thenextweb.com

Well here’s an interesting turn of events. According to Download Squad, it has been confirmed that Google is rolling out an HTC-built Chrome OS tablet. Apparently it’s set to debut on November 26th and will be sold via Verizon.

Oh, in case you’re not aware: November 26th is Black Friday, this year. The single biggest shopping day in the US.

As for hardware, we’re seeing this:

  • 1280×720 multitouch display
  • 2GB of RAM
  • 32GB SSD storage
  • WiFi/Bluetooth/3G
  • GPS
  • Webcam

Read more at thenextweb.com

 


Google & Verizon On Public Net Neutrality Support

I am actually glad that Verizon and Google have made certain regulatory recommendations for governance over the Internet. These two well respected companies in their individual markets.

Both companies agree that the FCC should be able to enforce net neutrality. Additionally, they agree that there should not be a throttling of services. Finally, Verizon and Google agree that no priority should be given to services that travel over the public Internet.

Did you catch that one word that changes the entire net neutrality argument — public. This one simple word leaves the door open to an entire ecosystem of private Internet services. Case in point YouTube can run over Verizon’s private Internet. How then would a consumer gain access to YouTube — well for a fee of course. In a case such as this — the FCC would have no jurisdiction. I am comforted in the fact that Schmidt explained — Google would never do that. By the way — I am being extremely sarcastic.

This new relationship that Google and Verizon have forged — leaves me feeling quizzy.

Amplify’d from thenextweb.com

The call started with Mr. Schmidt talking about how the FCC should be given the power to regulate wired internet service to enforce net neutrality. What is important is that Google believes the FCC should have the power to stop throttling of certain things, such as if a provider were to slow down BitTorrent traffic.

Mr. Seidenberg, for his announcement, added that immediate regulation for wireless does not make sense given how new it is and how it is still developing. In other words, the two CEOs were leveraging the fact that wireless resources are apparently scarce. The only requirement placed both on wired and wireless service would be one of transparency, which would provide “consumers clear, understandable information about the services they offer and their capabilities.”

Now for the important part. On net neutrality, both companies came down hard against priority access to internet content. But a very important point: a provider could give priority access to a service offered via something aside from what we think of as the open internet. So for example, Verizon could provide a dedicated channel to YouTube through its non-internet networks,though Mr. Schmidt quite adamantly claimed that Google would never do this “under any circumstances. Mr. Schmidt went further as to say that Google’s services would never be accessible from anything other than the open internet.

Read more at thenextweb.com

 


Microsoft Phone Idea Is Nuts #mobile

Microsoft just can’t seem to catch a break. I think the only person who thinks that Windows Phone 7 is a good idea is Balmer?

Amplify’d from www.informationweek.com

The article argues that Microsoft has a better chance of succeeding if it can attain better vertical integration. The problem (for Microsoft at least) is that it can never attain in mobile platforms the kind of integration that made Windows so successful on the desktop. Microsoft just does not have the kind of leverage in the mobile world that they do in desktop PCs.

The Nexus One experience at Google provides an even better example of why Microsoft would be nuts to build its own phone. The Nexus One is an excellent phone, built to Google specifications by HTC, yet Google was unable to sell significant volumes of the phone online. That is because the carriers sell most handsets in their own stores and subsidize the purchase. American consumers are just not used to buying phones online, even if they are comfortable with buying their PCs online from companies like Dell.

Having Verizon as the premier carrier for WP7 may be the first misstep that Microsoft has made. This is the same Verizon that completely hosed the pricing on the Kin phones, making them a financially stupid move for teen hipsters. (They may have been a bad move already for most users, but high data-phone pricing sealed the Kin coffin.) The Verizon commitment to WP7 is suspect as well, given that the company and their salespeople can always fall back to their tried-and-true iPhone. None of these problems are solved by a Microsoft Phone, and Kin was the proof of that.

Read more at www.informationweek.com

 


@google is heavyweight champion of #mobile search

It is just undeniable — Google is a search Goliath and the David’s in the world have a slim to no chance of toppling this giant.

If anything it seems that the only competition for Google is well Google.

Amplify’d from royal.pingdom.com

But if you look at mobile search, i.e. search on mobile devices, which is more or less the smartphone market, Google is utterly crushing the competition to a level that it’s never managed in the regular search market.

Just look at this very telling chart, showing Google’s overall search and mobile search market shares in relation to those of Yahoo and Bing, its two closest rivals. (These are global stats.)

Google, Yahoo and Bing search and mobile search market share

See more at royal.pingdom.com

 


Nokia Maintains Global Dominance #mobile

Reuters - Global Smartphone Share


Google has $30 Billion in the Bank #news #tech

I wonder why barely no growth Q1 2010?

Amplify’d from mashable.com

Google has released its second quarter 2010 earnings report. The centerpiece news is that revenue grew by 24% year-over-year to $6.82 billion — an impressive feat for the search giant. However, there was barely any growth from Q1 2010, when the company reported $6.77 billion in revenue.

  • Google-owned sites generated $4.5 billion in revenue, while AdSense and non-Google websites brought in $2.06 billion for the company — both grew by 23% from last year. International income sources represented 52% of total revenue.

Read more at mashable.com

 


Google Is Making You Into a Developer

AppInventor.png

Social media has turned many of us from content consumers into content producers. Tools such as Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr and Amplify have made the process rather simple. It is this simplicity that has become the catalyst for the content production revolution. The popularity of social media is tangible — nearly and Twitter enjoys a month.

AppInventor Google is banking on the same voracity of content production to fuel Android application development. To that end, Google is providing a non-developer platform that allows anyone to build an Android application.

Please read the rest at the Huffington Post…

New Media Brief #18: Cali Lewis goes bye-bye, Google at war Facebook, 1.7 Million iPhone's

On Today’s Show we discuss: Cali Lewis goes bye-bye, Google at war Facebook, 1.7 Million iPhone’s, Apple’s Class-Action Lawsuit, iPhone 4 can you hear me now. Hosts: Ramon B. Nuez Jr. and Zev Mo Green. Check out more at http://newmediabrief.com

Marvell’s Nafea Bshara Talks about Broadband

In 2005, the Federal Communications Commission delivered its’ Broadband Policy Statement. The policy lists four principles:

  1. to access the lawful Internet content of their choice.
  2. to run applications and use services of their choice, subject to the needs of law enforcement.
  3. to connect their choice of legal devices that does not harm the network.
  4. to competition among network providers, application and service providers, and content providers.

…services available to individual Americans represent an extraordinary advance in the availability of educational and informational resources to our citizens.” …the Internet plays an important role in the economy, as an engine for productivity growth and cost savings.

Please read the rest at the Huffington Post…